Thread: Taichi DeMarker EA

Originally Posted by funyoo

Demarker :

Silve line over Blue line and Blue line over Red line

funyoo, however in your EA code:

double CDS=iCustom(Symbol(),TimeFrame1,"Cronex DeMarker",TF1DeMarker,TF1FastMA,TF1SlowMA,0,i);
double CDR=iCustom(Symbol(),TimeFrame1,"Cronex DeMarker",TF1DeMarker,TF1FastMA,TF1SlowMA,1,i);
double CDB=iCustom(Symbol(),TimeFrame1,"Cronex DeMarker",TF1DeMarker,TF1FastMA,TF1SlowMA,2,i);

then, for BUY criteria

... &&CDS>CDB&&CDB>CDR

I assume you give the name CDR/CDB for Red/Blue line. But as coded, the CDR actually gets data from the BLUE line, and CDB gets the RED line value. Is it intended (to trade on the pullback), or a typo error which somehow turns the EA into profitable?

Originally Posted by clovelly

funyoo, however in your EA code:

double CDS=iCustom(Symbol(),TimeFrame1,"Cronex DeMarker",TF1DeMarker,TF1FastMA,TF1SlowMA,0,i);
double CDR=iCustom(Symbol(),TimeFrame1,"Cronex DeMarker",TF1DeMarker,TF1FastMA,TF1SlowMA,1,i);
double CDB=iCustom(Symbol(),TimeFrame1,"Cronex DeMarker",TF1DeMarker,TF1FastMA,TF1SlowMA,2,i);

then, for BUY criteria

... &&CDS>CDB&&CDB>CDR

I assume you give the name CDR/CDB for Red/Blue line. But as coded, the CDR actually gets data from the BLUE line, and CDB gets the RED line value. Is it intended (to trade on the pullback), or a typo error which somehow turns the EA into profitable?

Hi Clovelly,

Nice to meet you here.... too.... lol....

could you code it correctly to then backtest it? (if funnyoo won't answer) I am curious to see the results.... (i would, obviously, backtest it)

Hi,

Previous backtest on USD/JPY 5M TF with 90% modelling.

Regards,
Roscoe.-

Originally Posted by jackdan

Hi Clovelly,

Nice to meet you here.... too.... lol....

could you code it correctly to then backtest it? (if funnyoo won't answer) I am curious to see the results.... (i would, obviously, backtest it)

hi jackdan, I asked funyoo because he is an excellent coder and unlikely to make a simple typo error. Just that the strategy seems to be the reverse of the code, but like I asked, maybe the code is correct to rely on the pullback (when the blue Demarker line goes below the red one in an uptrend) for a safe buy. I did not want to post the "correct" code out of respect to funyoo, but it should be simple, by swapping the buffer index of those two lines:

double CDR=iCustom(Symbol(),TimeFrame1,"Cronex DeMarker",TF1DeMarker,TF1FastMA,TF1SlowMA,1,i);
double CDB=iCustom(Symbol(),TimeFrame1,"Cronex DeMarker",TF1DeMarker,TF1FastMA,TF1SlowMA,2,i);

I did try that and the result was not good. So the code-as-is is better, and maybe the wrong indices are deliberate. Maybe funyoo can clear it up.

Hello Mr. Funyoo,
Here you can see the weekly report.
it only goes down.
there is a new setup from them which one to use?
for them to use the ea positive and negative for me, they use a modified ea?
it would be nice if the modified files would give us.
best regards
viennatrader

hallo mr.funyoo,
this child is no cash machine
the destruction of money is in absolute perfection!
best regards
viennatrader

Viennatrader: Why you think that the configuration of EA for the EURUSD worked well for other pairs?

Vienna, EA has reverse function. That could be an easy way, no optimization solution.
So if you put it on reverse, all losers become winners

Vienna, what settings do you use and what time frame?
Could you please be more specific?

Dear FunYoo and fellow traders,

I respect what this site is aiming for but I must say that any EA with zero stoploss is not worth considering as it would never survive in the long run.

Furthermore, it is hard to find a single EA on this site with backtesting for more than 1-2 years. Data going back to 1999 is widely available so why not use it, then post the full results?

Isn't it time to ask for no more posts with zero stop loss and to also only start new EA threads once a full test has been completed?

Kind regards,

Pipalot