1. ## I have some info

I have attached the dummy indicator we can use to find cycles for now. Please try and find a stochastic and MACD etc divergence and show them to me to examine.
The idea is to get a programmer to put an arrow where the slope = 0 on the NonlagZigZag which implies a change of cycles. Then we will amend the Divergence indicators to find if there is divergence at the arrows of the indicator attached.

I hope this is clear.

2. hy
What do you think , our master Mr.Funnyoo
this indi looks interesting, how to use it in ea?

first - where in the code place signal to trade?

I have attached the dummy indicator we can use to find cycles for now. Please try and find a stochastic and MACD etc divergence and show them to me to examine.
The idea is to get a programmer to put an arrow where the slope = 0 on the NonlagZigZag which implies a change of cycles. Then we will amend the Divergence indicators to find if there is divergence at the arrows of the indicator attached.

I hope this is clear.

I don't know how to put the arrows on the peak or one bar after with this indicator.

Note that there is already ZigAndZag indicator that does this.

4. ## Hi funyoo and prz

I see you know your indicators well but unfortunately not well enough i'm afraid. The zigandzag places arrows several bars after the turning point and hence is not as useful. We need it at the turning point or the next bar in order to test divergence.
As for you prz I can see you tried to trade the Nonlagzigzag lol, but I told you that it has a lag in it, hence why there were trades showing at unexpected times rather than at the turning points.
We're using this indicator as a dummy indicator only, until the divergence is operating correctly we can't build a cycle indicator. We need to apply divergence at the turning points of the nonlagzigzag and hopefuly this should match turning points of the stochastic which is why the stochastic will need to be the leading indicator.

I hope I explained myself well.

I see you know your indicators well but unfortunately not well enough i'm afraid. The zigandzag places arrows several bars after the turning point and hence is not as useful. We need it at the turning point or the next bar in order to test divergence.
As for you prz I can see you tried to trade the Nonlagzigzag lol, but I told you that it has a lag in it, hence why there were trades showing at unexpected times rather than at the turning points.
We're using this indicator as a dummy indicator only, until the divergence is operating correctly we can't build a cycle indicator. We need to apply divergence at the turning points of the nonlagzigzag and hopefuly this should match turning points of the stochastic which is why the stochastic will need to be the leading indicator.

I hope I explained myself well.
yes,well
you are right,probably it will be good for trading. we must study this code but i'm at the begining in coding.

I see you know your indicators well but unfortunately not well enough i'm afraid. The zigandzag places arrows several bars after the turning point and hence is not as useful. We need it at the turning point or the next bar in order to test divergence.

Otherwise, there is 3_Level_ZZ_Semafor.

7. ## thanks funyoo

That is beautiful funyoo and prz please don't try and trade the number 3's on this zigzag you will only be disappointed lol. Save your efforts until we have something working.
Funyoo are you able to adjust the FX MACD divergence to test for divergence only from 1 bar before the number 3's at the number 3 and 1 bar after? So what we need is divergence to test not anywhere but at specified points which are the turning points. If there is divergence the Fx Macd divergence is to place an arrow in the direction of the prediction of the trade at the 1 bar after where the 3's appear. (By the way it has to test off the chart not using the indicator) for the reason that this is meant to be a dummy indicator and will be replaced.

Thanks

That is beautiful funyoo and prz please don't try and trade the number 3's on this zigzag you will only be disappointed lol. Save your efforts until we have something working.
Funyoo are you able to adjust the FX MACD divergence to test for divergence only from 1 bar before the number 3's at the number 3 and 1 bar after? So what we need is divergence to test not anywhere but at specified points which are the turning points. If there is divergence the Fx Macd divergence is to place an arrow in the direction of the prediction of the trade at the 1 bar after where the 3's appear. (By the way it has to test off the chart not using the indicator) for the reason that this is meant to be a dummy indicator and will be replaced.

Thanks
I could but it would take me at leat 5 hours (I have to check each change in the strategy tester) and as it is repainting it will generate a lot of bad signals. I don't think to have the time.

9. ## changes to divergence

Hi funyoo

Unfortunately if we cant do that then we have to accept the places where divergence occurs and test them against cycles which will produce more bad signals lol.
Perhaps there's an easier way?
We also need the stochastic divergence indicator to do the same.
What if you did part of it every now and then, and try to have it done in several days etc? I'm prepared to wait for something so precious (well it will be after it's finished) since its FUNYOO's work of art!

Cheers

10. ## Dear, Where can I find indicators?

Stochastic_Divergence V2
Slope Direction Line